Update 9/20/10 8:30 p.m.: Please check out John Fleck’s excellent post about the connection between La Niña and flow in the Colorado River. His reporting shows there is not much of a correlation. (Also see my update with comments from Klaus Wolter below.)
By one measure, the tropical Pacific Ocean has plunged into La Niña conditions at a record pace over the past three months. The result: as of September 3, this La Niña is the second strongest on record for this time of year.
This is the judgment of Klaus Wolter of NOAA’s Earth System’s Research Laboratory, writing in a recent update.
If moderate to strong La Niña conditions persist, as scientists expect, they should alter weather patterns around the world, including over the United States. Projecting specific impacts in the future is obviously a difficult proposition. But one scenario is that already dry conditions in the Southwest could worsen, further depleting lakes Mead and Powell on the Colorado River.
UPDATE 9/20/10 4 p.m. And some impacts may have already turned up. According to Wolter, La Niña typically is associated with dry and windy conditions in late summer and fall in Colorado, with a heightened risk of wildfire — and that has already happened.
In fact, a particularly intense wind storm on Labor Day weekend along Colorado’s Front Range was the strongest he had seen at that time of year for over two decades. That was the day that the Fourmile Canyon fire, the most destructive wildfire in Colorado history, started. Driven by the winds through dry forests, it quickly spread to more than 6,000 acres and destroyed 169 homes.
At ESRL, Wolter monitors the El Niño/Southern Oscillation, in which conditions in the tropical Pacific seesaw between warmer and cooler than normal sea surface temperatures. La Niña is the cool phase of the seesaw, and it began to take hold earlier this year.
NOAA’s official ENSO advisory, published monthly, focuses on a a number of variables, including sea surface temperature. The most recent advisory states simply that “it is likely that the peak strength of [of the current La Niña] will be at least moderate . . . to strong.”
Wolter uses a more detailed approach than the one employed in the official NOAA advisory. Called the “Multivariate ENSO Index,” or MEI, it takes into account more variables, such as winds, cloudiness, ocean and air temperatures, and atmospheric pressure. When La Niña conditions take hold, the index declines into negative values. This time, the MEI “has dropped just about as fast as it can,” Wolter says.
One has to go back to 1955 to find stronger La Niña conditions for this time of year in the MEI record, and back to September-October 1975 for lower MEI values at any time of year.
UPDATE 9/20/10 4 p.m.: Wolter says NOAA has been a little slow to acknowledge the speed of this La Niña’s development, and its depth. “NOAA has just been a bit too conservative in calling this one ‘moderate to strong’, he says. “My guess is that they will change their tune by next month’s update, or the month after that.”
Climatologist Bill Patzert of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., agrees that ”this La Niña has strengthened for the past four months, is strong now and is still building.” Quoted in a JPL press release, he worries about the impact on the southwestern United States and California:
“After more than a decade of mostly dry years on the Colorado River watershed and in the American Southwest, and only one normal rain year in the past five years in Southern California, water supplies are dangerously low . . . This La Niña could deepen the drought in the already parched Southwest and could also worsen conditions that have fueled Southern California’s recent deadly wildfires.”
La Niña typically brings enhanced chances of below-average precipitation in the Southwest (along with above average precipitation in the Pacific Northwest).
UPDATE 10/20/10 9:40 a.m: Here is part of Klaus Wolter’s response to some questions I sent him after I posted the original article. I’ll post all of his relevant comments as time allows. For now, here is what he says about the potential impact of the developing La Niña on Colorado and areas further south.
Big impact is dry late summer/fall weather, already being observed. There is also a higher risk of wildfires due to more windstorms as we get into early winter (the Labor Day windstorm west of Boulder was the strongest I have witnessed since 1988 for this time of year). As I wrote above, the prospects for areas to our south are fairly grim this winter, while November through February can be quite snowy with La Niña in our mountains (recall how 2007-8 had lots of snow during the winter months, except for November). I will probably come up with a more detailed forecast later this fall, stay tuned.
Lakes Powell and Mead along the Colorado River have been severely impacted by a decade of dry conditions. Lake Powell is currently at 63 percent of capacity. Lake Mead is in even worse shape: It’s at just 40% of capacity, and still dropping. To find a lower level for the lake, you have to go way back to 1936 1956, and before that to 1936 shortly after Mead began to fill.
Given the strengthening La Niña, a rebound doesn’t seem terribly likely. And that may be putting it mildly.


This thing has 5 Comments
Tom -
Very interesting. Thanks for the heads up.
A couple of things worth pointing out.
First, there’s not much of a correlation one way or the other between ENSO and Colorado River flow. I really need to do a full post on this, but basically the strongest La Nina signal is across the very southern part of the basin – southern Arizona and New Mexico. North of the NM-AZ/CO-Utah border, the effect of La Nina is relatively small. This is per Colorado River Basin Forecast Center data, which finds basically no correlation between ENSO and Colorado River flow.
Second, we’re not quite below the 1956 Lake Mead record yet: http://www.inkstain.net/fleck/?p=4894
John: Thanks for this information! I actually tripled checked the numbers for Mead’s elevation, yet somehow I read the entry for 1956 incorrectly. (Let’s chalk it up to small type and aging eyes…) So I’ll correct that mistake now. (Although this graph seems to indicate that the elevation is equal to or below that for 1956: http://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/hoover.pdf)
As to the impact of ENSO on Colorado River flow, you should definitely post something on that. The scientific literature I’ve seen over the years deals with precipitation, not river flow — and that’s what I’ve been going on.
That said, here is language from “Colorado River Basin Climate”, a 2005 report prepared for the Association of California Water Agencies and the Colorado River Water Users Association, that is consistent with what you said:
“Despite much searching, western North America climate
relationships to ENSO appear to be confined to the winter half year,
with slight or ambiguous associations with summer climate. In the
Basin, the strongest relationships are seen in the Lower Basin, south
of the San Juan Mountains of Colorado. The relationship becomes
less clear farther north, and begins to have the opposite effect in the
upper Green River basin and the Wind River mountains in Wyoming.
The division is at approximately Interstate 80, or a line from San
Francisco to Cheyenne.”
Later in the report, Brad Udall makes this observation about forecasting skill for NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center during El Niño and La Niña years with regard to precipitation:
“. . . the CPC forecasts lack precipitation skill at all times in the areas of the
basin which generate the most runoff, namely the Colorado Rockies
and the mountains of Utah and Wyoming.”
Of course, none of this says anything about actual water in the Colorado, which is what you are talking about. So it would be great to see your analysis of that! I’ll repost it here.
Lastly, before I posted this piece, I thought carefully about the word “dangerous” in the headline. I justified it based on the comments of Bill Patzert of NASA (see the post), as well as my understanding of the scientific literature. But do you think it goes too far? Should I change the headline?
I live in Montana, and this has gotten me STOKED for skiing this winter! Pow days for everyone! Sorry southwest, it’s not our fault.
I could not agree more with S-Jenk. After a dismal winter season for 2009-2010, the winter outlook has me and many of my colleagues very excited. Thanks for the info and let’s hope MT gets buried this year. We thought we were in for a devastating fire season in R1, but it was actually quite mild. Hopefully this winter will increase of fuel moistures.
MSO Skier: So here is my meteorological wish for you — may you be buried under more snow than you could ever imagine and have the all-time epic skiing winter! (If it comes to pass, please send us links to pictures!)
This thing has 3 Trackbacks
[...] pace, with potentially dangerous consequences September 20, 2010 — Richard Gayle La Niña may be strengthening at record pace, with potentially dangerous consequences[Via CEJournal] With data acquired by satellite, this map depicts La Niña conditions in tones of [...]
[...] La Niña rapidly strengthening, it is reasonable to ask what can be said about the resulting effect on flows in the Colorado [...]
[...] long range weather predictions I have read point to a drier and warmer winter season than normal. The effect of La Nina combined possibly with the warmer North Atlantic and Pacific waters could make for as little as 67% [...]